We Jews haven’t had a whole lot of joy to cry over these last almost 3 years, but today I cried with joy seeing this picture and story of the resilient love that Sasha and Sapir shared with the world. Ahm Yisrael Chai.
I am always happy when I can learn that things really aren’t so great for the current Iranian government (or whatever it is). But the wedding brought tears to my eyes. Thank you.
Our Judicial system is approaching crisis. It is high time a procedure, subject to ultimate accountability to the Knesset is acted upon. This undertaking should not impinge on the judiciaries' independence alike of the government, and to a large extent of the Knesset.
Hi Amit, I live in Quebec, where our Civil Code states a basic principle: that technicalities can’t be a reason for a body to stop functioning. So officers are responsible for getting business done, regardless of quorum, and decisions made where it wasn’t possible to respect the rules at the time can’t be declared invalid. I think that what the High Court is applying is actually a dose of common sense, that would be understood by the average child: you can’t boycott your way out of decisions made by the majority.
We Jews haven’t had a whole lot of joy to cry over these last almost 3 years, but today I cried with joy seeing this picture and story of the resilient love that Sasha and Sapir shared with the world. Ahm Yisrael Chai.
I am always happy when I can learn that things really aren’t so great for the current Iranian government (or whatever it is). But the wedding brought tears to my eyes. Thank you.
Our Judicial system is approaching crisis. It is high time a procedure, subject to ultimate accountability to the Knesset is acted upon. This undertaking should not impinge on the judiciaries' independence alike of the government, and to a large extent of the Knesset.
To probably misquote Chou En lai on the French Revolution "It's too early to say" which is little help to Israelis.
Hi Amit, I live in Quebec, where our Civil Code states a basic principle: that technicalities can’t be a reason for a body to stop functioning. So officers are responsible for getting business done, regardless of quorum, and decisions made where it wasn’t possible to respect the rules at the time can’t be declared invalid. I think that what the High Court is applying is actually a dose of common sense, that would be understood by the average child: you can’t boycott your way out of decisions made by the majority.